optymuss

i need to test some character specific stuff too. im tired of people acknowledging her as not a threat. you just need to think harder and outside the box.

It's interesting, but there's just too much stuff you can't really apply practically. First thing psych classes teach is usually Freud and the purpose of that is to dispel misconceptions he's formed. But, some how there's still a lot of bad psych around. If you do decide to pursue psychology try not to get bogged down in it. Try to stick to empirical stuff.

i think your refering to the college one. Im in the AP course for highschool. we are learning about stress and how it affects health but we actually going in more deeper than that. then we are learning about personality. im a type B. But thanks i will be sure to remember that.

Since JG is a new/improved mechanic it is very stupid and useless to make theories about it.

IMO i really think this mechanic was to just to help new players actually want to guard a move for a reason

Theory: player friendly doesnt JUST refer to you using the character it can also refer to the opponent facing the character.

Example: We all know how messed up voldo, Hilde and ivy are in the right hands. So why not change the style of voldo and make him player friendly? or change Ivy to make her less mixup oriented in her stances for the opponent? or refine hilde's charges? this is an example of "player friendly" IMO

making it more rewarding will help new players use it more in competitive/casual play and therefore rely on it. since the new brand of players adapt to the GI mechanic and understand its importance in SC5 it will then be tuned down in the future soul series (theory) due to the concept being too rewarding but players will then understand the basic mechanics of it.

thats my theory anyway

wiki is most of the time wrong though.