Which game in the series would you want re-released or remade?

C

cheddarsword

[04] Fighter
Not making this a poll.

Game choices range from Soul Blade/Edge all the way to Soul Calibur V (some of us like this one!)

And to be fair, since SCV is last gen, a simple re-release is a viable option for current gen, despite how recent of a release it is.
 
JAGTHEGEMINI said:
Soul Calibur 3 Arcade Edition for modern consoles.. I would probably not care for a SC6 if that happened
Click to expand...

Same. Though I can't really agree with the latter lol

SC3 is a real fun and stunning game. It feels criminal it hasn't got the HD treatment...yet at least.

SC1 and SC2 HD are already backwards compatible on X1 so I'm not really bothered about those two.

I don't know about the recent two games but in SC4's case Namco first need to renew that Star War's licence

Crash X said:
We don't need another remaster. The only thing we're concerned about right now is SCVI (or lack thereof).
Click to expand...

Who's we
 
limejuice said:
Same. Though I can't really agree with the latter lol

SC3 is a real fun and stunning game. It feels criminal it hasn't got the HD treatment...yet at least.

SC1 and SC2 HD are already backwards compatible on X1 so I'm not really bothered about those two.

I don't know about the recent two games but in SC4's case Namco first need to renew that Star War's licence



Who's we
Click to expand...

hmm... good point about the star wars license. in this situation, 4 doesn't even seem viable anymore. come to think of it, did it even have anyone new that sc3 didn't have aside from algol and the star wars characters?

also, i think a console based re-release of the PSP SC game would fix that problem. fairly sure the price of Kratos' license is cheaper than vader, starkiller and yoda combined. sure the sound is crap and the creation mode is a bit different, but it's still better IMHO.

they wouldn't even really have to do anything besides port it. granted, it's not SC3, but it's still good. plus, KRATOS!
 
Remakes are never a good thing unless it is an actual remaster like crash, or final fantasy. There is no point in releasing the same game twice just buy the original one. If we´re talking about remasters then of course sc2 but since we alraedy have HD this wont happen.
 
Oh_my_foot said:
Remakes are never a good thing unless it is an actual remaster like crash, or final fantasy. There is no point in releasing the same game twice just buy the original one. If we´re talking about remasters then of course sc2 but since we alraedy have HD this wont happen.
Click to expand...

to be fair, HD kind of is a remaster in one sense, since Heihachi and Spawn were never in the game together before (heihachi was ps2 exclusive while spawn was xbox exclusive) so that can change things quite a bit.

still wishing they'd added link back in on a nintendo version, but i can understand why they didn't. the nintendo version would be superior, and the fans would complain that they're missing out for not owning the failing wii u, and all that.
 
nah thats not what i´m talking about. Even if both of them are in the game its the same old thing. If they rerelease an old game then pls rebalance it replace every model/animation with new ones and dont just make them look shiny hd.
 
Oh_my_foot said:
nah thats not what i´m talking about. Even if both of them are in the game its the same old thing. If they rerelease an old game then pls rebalance it replace every model/animation with new ones and dont just make them look shiny hd.
Click to expand...

then that's more in line with a remake than a rerelease.

and a rerelease is exactly what SC2 hd online was, for the most part.

what you're asking for is a full on remake. that's fine, i'm all for that too.
 
limejuice said:
Same. Though I can't really agree with the latter lol

SC3 is a real fun and stunning game. It feels criminal it hasn't got the HD treatment...yet at least.

SC1 and SC2 HD are already backwards compatible on X1 so I'm not really bothered about those two.

I don't know about the recent two games but in SC4's case Namco first need to renew that Star War's licence



Who's we
Click to expand...
It is not just about a SC3 HD version but the ARCADE version which is VASTLY superior in generell and it is not right that most of us could NEVER experience that fine game
 
sc3 hands down, loved it to death and played pretty much every day after school.
my mains debut :sc3tir1: , the music, the stages, the amount of modes/extras, actual custom styles instead of default character clones (doesn't it say a lot that a game that came out over a decade ago had more content than the most recent ones) ....imo with modern-standard graphics it could d be pretty good. but this is under the assumption that PS gives any kind of fucks about quality standards anymore

i wouldn't prioritize it over sc6 though
 
Allyjandro said:
sc3 hands down, loved it to death and played pretty much every day after school.
my mains debut :sc3tir1: , the music, the stages, the amount of modes/extras, actual custom styles instead of default character clones (doesn't it say a lot that a game that came out over a decade ago had more content than the most recent ones) ....imo with modern-standard graphics it could d be pretty good. but this is under the assumption that PS gives any kind of fucks about quality standards anymore

i wouldn't prioritize it over sc6 though
Click to expand...
In terms of content I think SC3 had the most. Tales of Souls, the Soul Arena, Creation, CotS, etc...in terms of single player it has plenty to keep you busy. I think a re-release of SC3 to current gen consoles wouldn't be so bad, but at this point in time I feel SC6 would be the main goal for the series.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back