Rusted Blade
[14] Master
Yeah, you're preaching the choir homes: I have some formal background in physiology, a good understanding of newtonian physics, and have trained in martial arts since a kid (well, lapsed these days, but still), so I'm aware of how the biomechanics operate and how sexually dimorphic differences in muscle mass and conditioning shake out, as a general statistical matter. What had the HEMA people laughing up a storm at this halfwit was the particular arguments he was advancing--suggesting a woman couldn't even reliably lift a medieval weapon: the reality is that swords are in general pretty lite compared to what people who have never held one are inclined to believe. And as just about anybody who's done weapons training will tell you, the entire point of a weapon (especially a bladed weapon) is that they are a force multiplier: so while it is true that strength conditioning is far from irrelevant, the truth is that many of the world's great duelists are known to have been very diminutive and/or slight men. Knowing your craft as a swordsman always was more important than having the stature of a titan, once warfare and weapons-craft evolved beyond the very primitive stage where it was just bands of people throwing the overall mass of their fighters against that of their opponents.The only element of truth to the unrealistic argument regarding the sexes is that sexual dimophism does play a roll, in that on average, females are weaker than men on average due to increased height and upper body mass. So for instance, if you had a tribe of 10,000 people, at a rough guess there would be one warrior woman to twenty warrior men and that's across the entire world with our species. Nothing is more evident than having men and women separated in the majority of sports because men would dominate nearly all the top positions. We already see this with trans women smashing it against real women, something that has been causing a lot of controversy in recent years, so it's understandable that you wouldn't see women historically winning in these situations, but that's only because there are no second chances in warfare, you win or you die. Still, it was dumb of him to bring in the unrealistic argument over the Witcher of all games and it doesn't debunk the fact that there are women out there that are the exception to the rule. I'm 6'1", very broad and have a lot of strength for saying I don't work out, but I would never underestimate a trained female fighter putting me flat on my ass with ease.
So it's generally believed today that the relative paucity of cultures with warrior women* is better explained as a cultural inheritance and/or a relic of sexually dimorphic biopsychology/sociobiology more so than extreme handicaps in strength. But whatever the historical cause, the world of modern athletics and martial arts makes it pretty damn clear that the effective use of a sword is well within the reach of any human being of average health and discipline, if they are interested in putting in the time. The fact that this guy honestly thought that not only could no historical woman ever be classified as a true warrior, but also not even a hereditary leader in a fantasy scenario where the fictional social rules and training might have given her every reason to be one (and every advantage from birth to grow into one) demonstrates just how eagerly some people embrace their own constructed realities as fact, even where they are based on absolutely zero first hand knowledge from any relevant base of education in an applicable field.
*and let's remember there have been plenty of historical cultures where women were expected to know how to fight in the defense of their homes--particularly those where men might be absent for long periods of time.
Last edited: