Namco gives us the finger

IvyFanboy said:
There's a difference between being an annoying prick and being a threat to the community.
Click to expand...
Just because I don't tolerate someone doesn't mean I think they're a threat. Putting up with gay behaviour [scratch that, I mean, STUPID beliefs] because you think you have a moral obligation to do so is gay. I, like you, think it's silly if he believes he's one of the top 3 Zas players around. That's called being crazy. Yet, I only like to associate with logical people. So BAN.


Anyway, fuck this.
http://biblicone.com/wp-content/uploads/we_want_porn_in_iraq.jpg
 
Tee-hee! Artilust is one tedious and silly fellow.
Here's what I know of him.


His reasoning is ambiguous.
He's funny.
He seems to be trolling.
He's funny.
He crys more than a baby.
He's funny.
His Zas is easy.
He's funny.
He hates SCIV.
He's funny.
Oh wait he misses SCI-SCIII.
He's funny.
I remember him as a infamous whiner.
He's funny.
I'm gonna stop there.
He's funny.
Tee-hee!

Arti, you totally need explain why you're here. Lol.


 
IvyFanboy said:
I'm still hung up on the "Im the one of the top 3 Zas" comment. I seriously want an explanation to how one determines that without going to offline tournaments.
Click to expand...

Kind of like how you, laughably, pranced around the forums bragging about being one of the best Ivys? Only difference is Artilust whines about Zas sucking while you whine about Ivy being hard. I suppose another difference was that you sucked, but that's a story for another day.
 
Impending_Doom66 said:
Kind of like how you, laughably, pranced around the forums bragging about being one of the best Ivys? Only difference is Artilust whines about Zas sucking while you whine about Ivy being hard. I suppose another difference was that you sucked, but that's a story for another day.
Click to expand...

I have never in the history of this forum made such claims. Stop trolling. Keep on discussion.
 
IvyFanboy said:
I have never in the history of this forum made such claims. Stop trolling. Keep on discussion.
Click to expand...

I can vouch for Impending, you have said several times "I'm one of the best Ivys" or something of that context.

He wasn't trolling if he was telling the truth, just sayin'.
 
Artilust said:
This topic is filled with delusion.

Tekken is the more popular series. Doesnt matter how many copies it sold its the more bankable series. Tekken is the more respectable series. Calibur has been dwindling since SC1, getting worst over time.
Click to expand...
SC1 was good!!
SC2 was good+!!
SC3 was great!
SC4 was good!!

Calibur has been dwindling since SC1??
LOL
 
NFS255 said:
SC1 was good!!
SC2 was good+!!
SC3 was great!
SC4 was good!!

Calibur has been dwindling since SC1??
LOL
Click to expand...
2 things I disagree:

SC1 at itz time was more than good, it was awesome because it felt very new at that time and revolutionary.

SC3 wasn't at all that great, it was pretty bad. First, it sold less than a million copies and itz only on the PS2. Second, itz not well-balanced.
 
OMG Franman what are you doing.


SC1 Was REVOLUTIONARY...PERIOD!!!

SC2 Was an Improvement. Not as Long Lasting an amazing as SC1, but the Mechanices were there. Very GLitchy, but people still liked it because it was a Defensive Game.

SC3 - GREAT!! GREATEST!!! How can you possibly say this game was bad. This was probably the BEst Soul Cal thus far. Franman you are lost.

SC4 - Great, but still with some minor issues.

ALL GAMES CAN BE PLAYED AND ENJOYED!!! SCV WILL BE FUN!! CLOSE THIS THREAD YOU GUYS DONT EVEN KNOW WHAT YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT!!
 
SC3 at least had the balls to do something different. If it had an arcade release to balance things before the console release then it probably would have been a very, very good game. Actually, SC3:AE was a pretty fun game.
 
D.I.N.O said:
OMG Franman what are you doing.

SC3 - GREAT!! GREATEST!!! How can you possibly say this game was bad. This was probably the BEst Soul Cal thus far. Franman you are lost.
Click to expand...
Jesus Christ! DINO will you STOP picking on me! can't a man be alone expressing his opinions. Every time I post you have to pick on me! Besides I already gave 2 reasons why it was bad.

Jokes aside. Itz not that I hate SC3, I infact I like the game; however, I do feel that SC3 is the worst of all the series thus far. Also back in the old SC forums I see more complaints about this game than any of the series. Not only that SC3 didn't even make it to EVO.
 
Can someone explain to me what made SC3 so broken and unbalanced? I only played it casually, so I never learned about any of the apparently ridiculous things about it. The only one i'm aware of is X's 33B and 33 being incredibly overpowered.
 
Paragon049 said:
Can someone explain to me what made SC3 so broken and unbalanced? I only played it casually, so I never learned about any of the apparently ridiculous things about it. The only one i'm aware of is X's 33B and 33 being incredibly overpowered.
Click to expand...


VC...

Let me elaborate; VC is what killed the game. The game itself was good. Fast paced, a little more offensive (since that was the direction that namco was going into) X's 66A+B was overpowered, but not terribly broken.

Now asta's VC ability, lol. Let me explain it like this

Asta actually have 2A+K OR 2B+K throw. In which you can break. However, if you broke the throw, i can VC and get a FREE 4. Bullrush was pretty much unsteppable. His B throw was literally half life. And that was just asta's beefy nonsense. Sisters were good, X was good, Mitsu was upper mid, Zas was hella good (even tho he's only like 5 moves)

soooooo.....it wasn't terribly too bad. Just a few idiots tried to run a national tournamnet and failed us miserably.
 
franman said:
Soul Edge at itz time was more than good, it was awesome because it felt very new at that time and revolutionary.
Click to expand...

fixed

Soul Edge > Soulcalibur

franman said:
SC3 wasn't at all that great, it was pretty bad. First, it sold less than a million copies and itz only on the PS2. Second, itz not well-balanced.
Click to expand...

It wasn't that bad, better than 2 i think. The exclusive PS2 release says nothing about the quality of the game itself. VC shenanigans aside, i don't particularly remember anything ridiculously broken about the game. It at least wasn't too different from SC4 balance wise. Are you taking SC3:AE into account? Plus, lets also include SC4's original release prior to the patch. You know, the one with Ivy's infinite combo and Algol's ground stun from mid air. Keep in mind SC3 couldn't be patched.
 
NamcoInc.jpg
 
Chickenwing said:
VC...

Let me elaborate; VC is what killed the game. The game itself was good. Fast paced, a little more offensive (since that was the direction that namco was going into) X's 66A+B was overpowered, but not terribly broken.

Now asta's VC ability, lol. Let me explain it like this

Asta actually have 2A+K OR 2B+K throw. In which you can break. However, if you broke the throw, i can VC and get a FREE 4. Bullrush was pretty much unsteppable. His B throw was literally half life. And that was just asta's beefy nonsense. Sisters were good, X was good, Mitsu was upper mid, Zas was hella good (even tho he's only like 5 moves)

soooooo.....it wasn't terribly too bad. Just a few idiots tried to run a national tournamnet and failed us miserably.
Click to expand...


What exactly does VC stand for? I've seen it mentioned before, but I couldn't figure out what it might have meant. Whatever it stands for, it sounds hilariously overpowered.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back