D.I.N.O
[11] Champion
Lets Hope for a 16 Man Bracket. Like I said I will try my best to be there, but thats Yagna/Temple Time for me, and Steelband/Work, etc, Anniv, whole lotta whoa....
I heart Calibur.
I heart Calibur.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Lets Hope for a 16 Man Bracket. Like I said I will try my best to be there, but thats Yagna/Temple Time for me, and Steelband/Work, etc, Anniv, whole lotta whoa....
I heart Calibur.
EXPLAIN TO ME HOW YOUR LOGIC IS ANY DIFFERENT THAN THE BACKLASH MICROSOFT IS RECEIVING FROM XBOX ONE. PEOPLE ARE DISGUSTED WITH IT BECAUSE MICROSOFT WOULD RATHER APPEAL TO EVERYONE BUT THE PLAYERS THEMSELVES. THEN YOU’RE ACTING LIKE YOU SEE NOTHING WRONG WITH ADDING A NEW “HARMLESS” RULE. YOU CONSTANTLY TRY YOUR BEST TO DEFEND UTTER NONSENSE AND STILL STAND BY IT DESPITE NEGATIVE FEEDBACK, AND EVEN AFTER CONSULTING WITH NO ONE YET STILL INSISTING YOU’RE FOR THE COMMUNITY JUST BECAUSE YOU OFFER SOMETHING RATHER THAN NOTHING.If people don't want to come out and support the scene because of something so small and trivial, so be it then. I'm fine with sacrificing a couple of stubborn established players in order to gain even just one new player.
FUCK YOU, TOO. NOT ONLY IS THIS A LOADED COMMENT, BUT IT’S COMPLETELY UNCALLED FOR ESPECIALLY SINCE YOU HAD “NO IDEA” WHAT I WAS TALKING ABOUT. I’D LOVE TO ARGUE THE TRUTH OF THE MATTER BY CHALLENGING YOUR STATEMENT, BUT YOU DON’T GIVE A FUCK ANYWAY BECAUSE YOU PREFER TO BELIEVE WHATEVER THE FUCK YOU WANT JUST LIKE OOF. THANKS FOR YOUR USELESS INPUT AS ALWAYS.As for Vints, I have no idea what he is saying. But he actually has the most excuses when he loses, like "it wasnt a MM, or it wasnt a FT10" etc.
First just to address one issue earlier, people being neutral about about a subject does not mean their on your side. They are indifferent. I could just as easily say "there are more people against it OR NEUTRAL than there are people who are vehemently FOR it.I've decided to allow DJ, based on people who spoke up it seems more people are ok with him or neutral than there are people who are vehemently against it. At the end of the day allowing DJ equates to "no harm, no foul". There really isn't much harm that can be done to the SC community by allowing DJ in a local tourney. In fact, the real harm to the community comes from individuals who attempt to cause forum drama and boycotts, where as otherwise the show would go on smoothly.
I wonder would this be cognitive dissonance? Someone help me out.Russell, I honestly did not expect any Tekken players to come. The point is to have the harmless option of allowing him available so that the potential for new players that may be interested in DJ is there.
And guess what? I already spoke with a player who got into SCV when it first came out and favoured Devil Jin, and ended up dropping the game because we banned his character. He's now interested again and said he will get back into the game and train for the tourney. So this rule has already brought in a new player and the potential for more is still there.
As for established SCV players who choose to boycott because of a rule that will hardly affect them
I place any blame of detriment to the community because of their actions completely on them, and not on myself or the rule that's in place. Personally I don't think it's worth it to negatively impact the community in that way because they don't agree with a harmless rule.
I'm fine with sacrificing a couple of stubborn established players in order to gain even just one new player.
Lol wut? It's a Saturday dude.Duuuuuuuuuuuude that thing's a wednesday?? ...................
Wallace!! At you free to play this Wednesday?? Come to my place and we'll play!!OMG, I can't stop playing SCV straight from yesterday till now. I must addict it again. kljflsadfj
When I touch it, I can't leave. XD
I gotta address some points because oof is trying to shift blame on other people.
I think this is the most telling. From this it is clear Oof is not doing this in the community benefit. As he says he will sacrifice a couple (couple being more than 1) for the possibility of 1 new player. This essentially will result in lower turnout.
In my view from this it really make Oof a detriment to the community. From stuff like this to the putting down the offline scene with his online>offline rant or anytime this guy communicates there is always problems.
-----
---
Also June 29th a Saturday.
I think you misunderstood me Francis, by "sacrificing" I didn't mean ousting them from the community. I only meant in regards to this tournament. It means if established players don't attend, that's fine because they are established players and probably won't be going anywhere. New players however are gone by default and we need to bring them in. Hope you get my drift.Also I had a feeling that sacrificing players would continue to repeat the same cycle or make matters worse.
Oh right, I was looking may my bad.Lol wut? It's a Saturday dude.
I understand better now that you clarify it.I think you misunderstood me Francis, by "sacrificing" I didn't mean ousting them from the community. I only meant in regards to this tournament. It means if established players don't attend, that's fine because they are established players and probably won't be going anywhere. New players however are gone by default and we need to bring them in. Hope you get my drift.
Not just that, but it's obvious that Scrubymuffins, Eli and Chu Fye do have a silly vendetta against me based on their constant aggressive posts towards me. Meanwhile I just shake my head, ignore them, and carry on with organizing and promoting this tournament.Man, when did running Tournaments become such a hassle. Why can't people just play.