SOULCALIBUR 6: News, leaks and information discussion.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Siegmare
DUbqDgTV4AA_fZ4.jpg:large
 
Siegmare is very cool looking, I can get behind this. Maybe armor breaking wasn't a mistake! :sc2nm2:

I'm still holding out for Zasalamel's CE being summoning a giant cogwheel to smash his opponent.
But I can roll by pressing the side arrow right?
That would be hysterical, but kind of OP if you could tech out of a CE. I don't quite think that would be alright unless all of them were escapable.
 
Yeah I'm surprised no one felt the same about mistu's CE...I mean come on lol..can't they be more creative than just giving him 2 basic sword strikes, with some special effects for a CE. Imo some of his moveset looks better than his CE.
The kilik combo were he spun the staff, launched, and used the pole stab looked better then his ce.
 
Before anyone jumps to conclusions, this appears to be armor-break on Nightmare

At least looking at the armor remaining on his hips and waist, it appears consistent. The crotch plate, the hip-faulds and the wing armor on the knee appear to be identical to Nightmare's 2p colours

How cool would it be if armor-broke Nightmare (basically Siegmare) would have his VO change (less muffled in-helm)
 
That could be the case. But you see how you put the word "maybe" to quantify that you didn't know for a fact? That needs to be done by others...
yeah

We should have some basic integrity to help other people differentiate between wild guesses, speculation, and actual confirmed facts
 
After that, I'm kind of hoping Siegfried without the Nightmare persona sits out. Technically would be another Oprah situation.
Very much disagree. Siegfried and Nightmare are a lot more different than Pyrrha and Pyrrha Omega.


As far as Grøh and Kilik's transcendent forms and modified CEs, that seems a very valid reasoning. Sadly that gameplay footage 17m didn't feature either of them doing transforming, so until we get some footage that does, no way to know for sure.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back