franman
[13] Hero
When I say gaming peripherals I mean type of controllers for gaming such as mouse, keyboards, control pad, keypads etc.
What is the thought process behind this before making your final decision on which product to buy?
Have you ever given much thought on the product before making your purchasing decision?
Do you ever compare products?
Whenever I consider purchasing a product, I look at 4 aspects and yes thees aspects are ranked:
Build/Quality is one of the other 3 and is placed 2nd because at the price I can afford, the material has to be high quality, durable and doesn't break easily in a short period of time.
Ergonomic Design, in some cases the terminology may apply to what general aspects the general public feels comfortable in using that product, but I go by my own individual perception based on my own comfort level of using a product.
Finally, I place features last because let's put it this way, if I place features above everything else or by just one or two or three places above a certain aspect, the price will likely be over-budgeted; I may not enjoy the features for a long period of time due to poor quality and the RMA process is too much of a hassle. Bad ergonomic design means not fully taking advantage of these features. Of course when comparing two products in similar categories that satisfies the first 3 aspects I'd go for the one with the better feature.
What is the thought process behind this before making your final decision on which product to buy?
Have you ever given much thought on the product before making your purchasing decision?
Do you ever compare products?
Whenever I consider purchasing a product, I look at 4 aspects and yes thees aspects are ranked:
- Price
- Build/Quality
- Ergonomic Design
- Features
Build/Quality is one of the other 3 and is placed 2nd because at the price I can afford, the material has to be high quality, durable and doesn't break easily in a short period of time.
Ergonomic Design, in some cases the terminology may apply to what general aspects the general public feels comfortable in using that product, but I go by my own individual perception based on my own comfort level of using a product.
Finally, I place features last because let's put it this way, if I place features above everything else or by just one or two or three places above a certain aspect, the price will likely be over-budgeted; I may not enjoy the features for a long period of time due to poor quality and the RMA process is too much of a hassle. Bad ergonomic design means not fully taking advantage of these features. Of course when comparing two products in similar categories that satisfies the first 3 aspects I'd go for the one with the better feature.
Last edited: