- Thread starter
- #21
HydroJames
Shining Sea Dragon
What is your recommended course of action?Yeah, good luck with that.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What is your recommended course of action?Yeah, good luck with that.
BTW, are just talking about Patroklos?How many fans? The amount of people who like Patroklos as character (not as a moveset) can be counted with one hand.
In that case, I wonder which style he'll keep in SCVI: Setsuka's or his own.Just remember Patroklos started to change at the end of the story, so he will be more mature for SC6. Same goes for Phyrra.
Better be his own. Even if they change a bit and remove the shield, so people will not complain about "too many sword and shield users" Just and idea.In that case, I wonder which style he'll keep in SCVI: Setsuka's or his own.
He shall keep using Setsuka's style, since he is better with it.In that case, I wonder which style he'll keep in SCVI: Setsuka's or his own.
I think they did it because. you know... SPOILERS!Better be his own. Even if they change a bit and remove the shield, so people will not complain about "too many sword and shield users" Just and idea.
But anyway, PS has shown in LS that they prefer Patroklos with his style and not Patsuka. This, and the fact that A-Pat profile no longer exists, almost confirm Patroklos with his style for SC6.
My idea may sound extreme, I usually stick with the original game developers plan, but I'll go for it anyway. I think the majority of consumers bought this game mainly cuz of CAS and since I assume that this feature maybe the winning bread here, I think CAS maybe the main feature for the next SC iteration.
So what does that mean for the original cast? They will be made out of CAS parts as original presets. However, it shouldn't be from some weak ass tool set for character creation. The tools for creating a character should be powerful enough for even character modelers to give the nod.
I'm insane I know.
I doubt they will but since we're pretending to be developers, the first thing I would go for is fighting styles that would cater a player's play style.
Some players would mainly rush-in, while some would like to turtle back, and some would have a mix in in-betweens. Great, maybe let the players develop areas in their play style as they level up their character.
I can't believe I'm quoting TVTropes on this but I couldn't have said it better myself:Just remember Patroklos started to change at the end of the story, so he will be more mature for SC6. Same goes for Phyrra.
He's like Justin Bieber: No one wants his sorry ass...well, except the fangirls.It doesn't matter if he changed in the end, people will hold what he had been doing for most of the story against him if returns. Not to mention the massive incest overtones really creeped fans out. Fans don't like him, and it would take a miracle to redeem him in their eyes.
Also, when Patroklos was announced for LS. I saw numerous comments yelling "NO!!!". It seems like practically no one wants him around.
LOL so true.How many fans? The amount of people who like Patroklos as character (not as a moveset) can be counted with one hand.
How many Patroklos fangirls are there? The ones who ship him with Pyrrha?He's like Justin Bieber: No one wants his sorry ass...well, except the fangirls.
But it is on topic. Patroklos and the rest of the new SCV characters are poison to the series. If we were developing an SC game, we would ideally remove them.Can we put this thread back on topic? I don't want the mods to close the thread on the grounds that it's become a "Reasons why Patroklos sucks" thread.
If ppl want to play Patroklos they can, he's already made from CaS preset parts.I would reintroduce CaS exclusive styles, including giving them Patroklos' sword and shield style, just so people like Blueboyb would not be screwed over. I would also tie them to bonus characters to save tournament organizers the trouble of having to make CaS.