1. I wasn't literal about everything being worthy of being charged as a crime, merely that these were personality faults and mis-actions that paint Patroklos in a heavily negative light and image.
2. Good point, but it doesn't absolve Patroklos. Keep in mind that Patroklos was born with soul...
By that logic, the Phantom Menace was a successful movie despite being widely regarded as the most disappointing movie ever released.
Meanwhile, great games that don't sell well are failures along with good movies that under-performed due to terrible marketing despite overwhelmingly positive...
For what?
Pat was set-up in promotions and previews the " Heir To The Title of Holy Warrior" and the Main Hero of the new story. Never in those previews did it say that Pat starts out as an unlikable asshole who murders people in cold blood.
Which is honestly part of the fundamental difference...
A flawed defense that's based in a fundamental strawman.
The topic is about making a specific defense about Patroklos and his actions/attitude. It doesn't matter if other characters did bad things too or had flaws because it doesn't change what Patroklos did.
The fact that the best defense...
SCVI? Yes.
Super SCV? No.
I'd say yes if this was a year and a half ago, but releasing a "super edition" of an incomplete game about 3 years after the original release and making people pay full price to finally see the real SC game that they petitioned for?
Nay I say. Put full resources...
True, SC becoming evil due to isolation and being created from Soul Edge itself is pretty natural to happen as I'd brought up before. My question is whether this angle will stick in future games or if they'll go for a grey-grey morality scale by having both swords be evil with different flavors...
Long story short, the theory suggests that between SCI and SCII, Soul Calibur was quietly corrupted by Soul Edge's essence and that's why it became knight-templarish in SCIV and onwards.
1) Xianghua dropped the sword in I and it was trapped in the void with Inferno for 4 years. During which...
Trial and Error with different characters and their move-sets. Then I narrowed it down to whoever fit my play-style and refined it through combat with hard or higher cpu's or fighting folk online. In short, I learned through experience.
Maybe for the most of the actual members on the site. But there does seem to be a certain mentality among the more vocal members of this site. Said mentality is described best by Hook's post and can be summarized as intolerant elitists who give other competitive players a bad name.
Does anyone agree that there's a lot of truth to what Hook said in his post? I'm inclined to agree with him based on what I've seen since for the past 2 years.