Aug 9, 2018 #21 HolyCarp [14] Master thenewperson said: I'm guessing her T/AS B hitting a BT opponent still results in no AT? Always wondered what the logic behind that was. Click to expand... Because Sophie is pure and would not stab her friends in the back.
thenewperson said: I'm guessing her T/AS B hitting a BT opponent still results in no AT? Always wondered what the logic behind that was. Click to expand... Because Sophie is pure and would not stab her friends in the back.
Aug 9, 2018 #22 Patroklos [09] Warrior Xeph said: Possible wall splat or RINGOUT potential. 66B, TAS B, TAS B is a combo, but only in SOULCHARGE mode. Otherwise, looks like 66B, TAS B, 4B is your BnB when not in SC. Click to expand... Actually, I made a mistake. I meant to write 4:36, not 3:36.
Xeph said: Possible wall splat or RINGOUT potential. 66B, TAS B, TAS B is a combo, but only in SOULCHARGE mode. Otherwise, looks like 66B, TAS B, 4B is your BnB when not in SC. Click to expand... Actually, I made a mistake. I meant to write 4:36, not 3:36.
Aug 10, 2018 #23 Phoenix1985gr [08] Mercenary Patroklos said: Actually, I made a mistake. I meant to write 4:36, not 3:36. Click to expand... Omg thank you for the clarificaction, cause i really couldnt figure it out the reply about the RO potential, since obviously in 3:36 wasnt anything there :)
Patroklos said: Actually, I made a mistake. I meant to write 4:36, not 3:36. Click to expand... Omg thank you for the clarificaction, cause i really couldnt figure it out the reply about the RO potential, since obviously in 3:36 wasnt anything there :)