KingAce
HERMITISM
I don't mind criticism, in fact I recommend it while commentating. People make mistakes, and as a commentator you have an opinion. If you hold yourself back you're only hurting the commentary.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I analyze matches in my head, so I bet it's hard as hell to do it while talking. Can you really keep up with the action is the question?
This is fun to watch BTW.
Without looking at the matches.
Amy VS NM
It's all about offense vs defense.
It's a downhill match for NM. The only way for him to generate offense or damage is with throws to pressure Amy into ducking, and whiff punishing with SideStep and backdash or NSS. Otherwise all his other options are very risky and opportunistic.
In addition defensively NM might risk aggressive options like 9B to avoid Amy's mid low mixups.
Amy just does whatever she wants.
Overall I think when the action is going back and forth you want to do play by play. Correct Punishment or missed, Missed Ringout opportunities, missed combos, complementing good reactions like sidestep, gis, JFs...and such. When players back off, spacing around looking for opportunities you have time to anaylze.
SC runs on momentum so if you can point out when that shift happens it gets more exciting.
Agree with Partisan, Excellent video and very imformative.
Also I take great pictures.
The original footage ends with me winning 5 straight games. In your video, you examine the very first match and declare Partisan the winner of a highly intense tournament match. Oh, I mean casual match. Dumbass. I am sure you are just what this community needs, more false judgments. By the way, even if you did select 3 matches to comment on, there would still be 6 matches unaccounted for, and no explanation as to why I suddenly had such a long streak at the end. Consider it all, or consider nothing. Critiquing 11% of something seriously is just pathetic!The problem for me is not wanting to commentate for a 20 minute video. Maybe out of these long sets I'll choose three matches(first, middle, end) that should show somewhat of progression and keep length down. This should reflect a more true game and the mentality behind it.
The original footage ends with me winning 5 straight games. In your video, you examine the very first match and declare Partisan the winner of a highly intense tournament match. Oh, I mean casual match. Dumbass. I am sure you are just what this community needs, more false judgments. By the way, even if you did select 3 matches to comment on, there would still be 6 matches unaccounted for, and no explanation as to why I suddenly had such a long streak at the end. Consider it all, or consider nothing. Critiquing 11% of something seriously is just pathetic!
Take Partisan's advice, if you're going to comment on footage, focus on the technical aspects, not your opinion. I couldn't express my opinion on Partisan's play with any sort of real certainty if I were the one commentating...there are just too many factors to consider, yet somehow everyone here is cool with some guy who doesn't even know the players running his mouth. SMH.
Ooh! Ooh! *raises hand jumps about like a kid*I'm going to be interviewing NeoRussell next.
I'll take a few community questions if anyone has any