Last time I checked this thread was about the legality of smoking not the difference in mortality between pot and tobacco. Our argument is just a by-product of this conversation. Dont be butt-hurt about being wrong. It happens.GTFO of the conversation. The words aren't being put in your mouth - they're in the thread you're participating in.
There is no argument about water being a filter. There is a discussion about cigarettes being more harmful than pot.
Do you normally take Ritalin? Did you miss it today? :\
I now am a strong advocate of the "ignore feature". Last page and a half was nothing but ignored members....I LOL'd.
And again insults will get you nowhere. Stop being a child and admit you are pulling arguments out of your ass.
Going back through the thread both sides have been a bit close-minded in accepting the other side's point. I'm pretty sure that common sense would dictate that making revenue off of something that people are going to do anyway by decriminalizing it would save money spent on enforcement and incarceration. It would also free-up law enforcement, courts and prisons to deal with more pressing matters. Not only would society save money on man hours for cops and courts it would save money on food and housing for inmates on top of bringing in additional tax revenue. If you need exact numbers to believe this equation I'm going to be skeptical of not only your logic but your objectivity.The hypocrisy and irony of this statement coming from you is mind blowing.
Communications often create sub-topics. The sub-topic you're jumping me over is water being a filter. You can go discover that on your own - it's not relevant to the sub-topic.
You are literally creating an argument about water being a filter to prove yourself right irrelevant to any current topic. Call me a child?
My arguement ultimately is against people saying incorrect shit to support a claim. Which is relevant to any topic and its somethings you did.
Actually, it's not something I did. If you can bother to remember the original post you quoted.... it had "filter" in quotation marks.
Water pipes do not remove a significant amount of carcinogens or even a comparable amount as fiber filters. It is not an acceptable filter.
... doesn't even bother to filter (water doesn't count) which ...
Even after the clarification that it's not an adequate filter (in relation to making smoking safe) you still refused to come off of the argument.
Oh. Im terrified.I'll be happy to spam you just as hard as you spam me - but be warned, I type pretty fast and accurately.
Ya, sure you didn't.