listen to this man every time i play jug i say im bust yo ass and every week he beats me but i play well against him i mostly talk a lot just cuz from what i know in the pass anyone i talk shit to play better because they want to shut me up lol thats what i live for ppl proving me wrong (in games) so i can get better learn from what i just got raped by and i thought that jeff was one of those ppl *sigh* sorry jeff if i mad u mad real talk but im not going to practice with cammy at all this week ima work on my Sagat on stick and ima take that shit lol
Hey it's cool man now you know. Ha and I did want to shut you up, but I got more mad at myself when I started losing, and losing just happens sometimes. Let's hit the Sagat/Honda fight hard at Smash Club if we get the chance. I say take it over, get two TVs going! Otherwise, we'll play in two weeks.
Chacha - I don't really think you should try to use negative points to make up for having a system that awards too many points to the top end. I think instead of negative points, you should re-do the system to have a closer point spread. It actually wouldn't take much effort at all since you still have the old results.
Something like 3000, 2000, 1500, 1250, etc...
(You might even want to make it closer than this)
If we keep the current subtraction system, things could get kind of wonky. Say someone works hard and gets 3rd one week. Next week he gets his usual 5th. Not bad? Too bad he loses all the points he gains that second week. Same thing happens if you go from 2nd to 3rd. You do WORSE the second week than the guys that don't win a game, they get 100 points.
Or see what happened to me this week. If I wouldn't have made it yesterday, I would have gotten -100 points. I had 10,000 before, so that's 9,900. But I did come and didn't place, so I got 500 points but also got -1000. Now I have 9,500. So, it would have been better for me to not even show up.
Note - Above I'm assuming you won't double penalize top placers who can't make it. Say Jug gets something that comes up randomly, and he can't avoid missing game night. Is it fair to take 2100 points away for that sort of thing? If you do decide to keep the system, maybe only do -100 for misses, and then keep the place subtractions for the next time they actually play?
So anyway, that's some examples why I think we should tighten the point spread. Good players will still go to the top, but at the same time there is still pressure because the other players aren't far behind. Even this system though needs some help for the non-Jugs among us. So instead of negatives, how about more bonuses? Keep the bonus for most improved player, give bonuses for anyone who breaks into top 3, etc. It's a lot more of a friendly system than taking away points. Losing points from your overall total because you did a little worse just seems wack.