You're misunderstanding the point. You make a thread about wondering if the games are getting bad or good. Many answered and you're just going in circles on uncertainty trying to find the most deep answer. Stop that. All we're saying is learn to accept reality and that's all there is to it.
Actually I'm just trying to get more ppls opinions on this. That's all I was doing; if you answered, good shit. I'll wait to see if anymore ppl have anything to say. If not, this thread doesn't need anymore attention. I can just take the intellect I got from others & go find more, else where & maybe come to a conclusion.
Edit: Also if you think I don't know something you do, say it & stop beating around the bush. I kinda feel like some ppl think I can read their mind & expect me to know wtf they do IF I didn't know it.
Someone I know who doesn't have an account here asked me to point these things out.
1) Not all glitches are game breaking
2) Everyone is allowed to use these glitches
3) A number of glitches take skill to perform (this is against the argument of glitches being braindead and easy to perform)
4) If the glitch was a feature, would you suddenly be ok with it? Why? If they required no skill to perform and were as broke as you claimed, then whether it's a glitch or a feature wouldn't change that fact, so why would you be ok with it then and not before if they would have the same effect in the end?
1)
Not all glitches are game breaking: Where I came from, they were. It's good that this guy didn't.
2)
Everyone is allowed to use these glitches: Your an asshole if you do. The only reason to do them is because one cannot rely on their own skill to get the job done the way the game is made. If you knew you were good, you wouldn't need to do it. If you knew you were horrible & you knew there's a glitch to cover up your lack of skill for compensation, your an asshole that would wanna cheat somehow to take the fairness out of the game. It'd be like taking steroids in the olympics because you couldn't do it on your own.
3)
A number of glitches take skill to perform (this is against the argument of glitches being braindead and easy to perform): Your still an asshole if you use them; feeble too. If you don't think so, then your probably one of those guys who uses them against others just to take the fairness out of the game. (Keep in mind, I came from games that contains game breaking glitches). Also the skill to perform it wouldn't matter anymore, once you got it down. Above all why would you do it anyway? My only guess is because your bad at playing the game legitly.
4)
If the glitch was a feature, would you suddenly be ok with it? Why? If they required no skill to perform and were as broke as you claimed, then whether it's a glitch or a feature wouldn't change that fact, so why would you be ok with it then and not before if they would have the same effect in the end?: If it became a feature, I'm pretty sure game designers wouldn't be that stupid to have another thing bypass this feature, in order to balance the game. If it wasn't balance then I'm pretty sure I'd feel the same way if it wasn't a glitch. Would you make something a feature in a game & leave it unbalanced? For an example: Going through walls in CoD, or DBZ goin through the air & freezing your enemy leaving him defenseless for you to get a free shot in every single time you do it.
Hopefully I don't get penalized for answering questions that was directed to me...