Things you DON'T wanna see in SC6

yea but you cant back anything of that up with facts. ScIV for example has a terrible netcode awful movement 3 guest characters and imbalanced ones like Algol and Hilde (Sc BD is pretty much the same thing but a bit better since its handheld and dampierre so thats cool,and i believe they rebalanced it even though i´m not sure about that), Sc 3 had alot of content that for sure but it was terrible content, CaS styles were awful, The game wasnt balanced, And offline content like Cronicles was just super out of place. ScV atleast had innovative new fighting styles. A balanced game good netcode. And Sc2,1 were great back then but if i compare sc 2h d to V i´d pick V any day.

Oh btw and back again to characters being hollow if it comes to visuals voice acting and playstyle Zwei Viola Damp Algol Hilde Pat are amazing . A character isnt bad just because he has no impact in story mode. Thats like super unimportant.
 
Oh_my_foot said:
yea but you cant back anything of that up with facts. ScIV for example has a terrible netcode awful movement 3 guest characters and imbalanced ones like Algol and Hilde (Sc BD is pretty much the same thing but a bit better since its handheld and dampierre so thats cool), Sc 3 had alot of content that for sure but it was terrible content, CaS styles were awful, The game wasnt balanced, And offline content like Cronicles was just super out of place. ScV atleast had innovative new fighting styles. A balanced game good netcode.
Click to expand...

Yes, V has better netcode than IV and slightly better graphics.
CAS styles in III include original & bonus movesets which are different to any other other character's style,
whereas IV & V rehash only what's left of the original styles for CAS which was another regression.

Content wise III puts to shame IV & V.
 
yea but as i said having much content doesnt make the game good. If you take away all that content sc3 isnt much else than a worse sc2 therefore it isnt better than 5. I´ll repeat it again Toptier ScV Sc2 then sc3 Bd IV. And ScVs characters and gameplay makes it more enjoyable than 4 or 3. Oh and also CaS styles arent rly important in the first place I´d prefer Original characters over that any day.
 
Oh_my_foot said:
yea but as i said having much content doesnt make the game good. If you take away all that content sc3 isnt much else than a worse sc2 therefore it isnt better than 5. I´ll repeat it again Toptier ScV Sc2 then sc3 Bd IV. And ScVs characters and gameplay makes it more enjoyable than 4 or 3.
Click to expand...

Secondary content in SCIII is far superior to V, chronicles of the sword storytelling which was the weakest area in SC III is still much
better than Patroklos and Pyrrha storytelling in V.

You left out the original Soulcalibur I release in your ranking, have you had a chance to play it?
 
I mean yea they shouldnt have focused on 2 characters for the entire story mode but if you look at their story compared to other characters individual storys it isnt worse. And no I never played sc1 or soulblade but i already mentoined that. But i´m not talking shit about hwang because of that. Every character in sc so far had a great unique design some more than others but everyone earned a spot (not including oprah or apat since they are just recolours). For example i dont like taki i think she is just your every day ninja but still she is good enough to be in the game since her design and moveset fit what they were trying to do.
 
Oh_my_foot said:
I mean yea they shouldnt have focused on 2 characters for the entire story mode but if you look at their story compared to other characters individual storys it isnt worse. And no I never played sc1 or soulblade but i already mentoined that. But i´m not talking shit about hwang because of that. Every character in sc so far had a great unique design some more than others but everyone earned a spot (not including oprah or apat since they are just recolours)
Click to expand...

I agree on that, focusing the story on 2 characters didn't help to draw more attention to the game
and events depicted on that particualr time frame, perhaps if they could have finished all what was originally
intended, some more interesting developments could have been revealed and incorporated.

I also don't play much as Taki and Talim, which I'm aware you're not fond of,
but it's also enjoyable to play their story progression experience and point of view concerning the events.
Ohhh.. and creaming them with any other character is most satisfying as well.
 
Oh only talking about fighting style and character design i dont dislike talim. I actually think Voldo,Dampierre and her are pretty much the most creative characters in the entire series since their appearances and styles are made completely from scratch and have never been in other games before. The other characters arent bad because of that but they are based on actual fighting styles and medieval looks so its easier to come up with a finished character and the characters end up being less creative.nightmare yoshi sieg n stuff are great but big sword guys and samurais (even though a weird one) have been there before
 
Last edited:
Here's something that NO ONE will ever want to see in SC6:

Random whiffs.




image.jpeg
image.jpeg
 
Nah I love that shit .The game would be too easy without having a 60% whiff chance.
#Realcalibur
 
Just scrap the gameplay mechanics that deviate from the first installments and it will surely turn out great gameplay wise.
 
^that except for the CE part. ScV gameplay best gameplay.
If we scrap everything that isnt like in sc 1 we got ourselves a game that isnt anywhere near todays standards.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom