I was going to make a poll for this, but because there's no option to vote for multiple things, I think it'd be counter-productive. I'm against bans for any unique characters (as in not custom or Bonus) regardless, but I'll at least respect the decision of a TO when it's done because attendance would plummet. For that purpose, here is my pseudo-poll.
Who would be your fundamental make-or-break character(s) that would determine whether you would attend or not? To clarify, state if you will absolutely not attend a tournament if Yoda is legal, only attend if all are legal, etc. This way, TOs can see what course of action would cost the least amount of players (any course is going to cause some people not to attend on either side).
For me, I will attend tournaments with bans solely because I need to have tournament experience to get better. However, I will continue to train against all characters and encourage my opponents in friendly play to use whoever they want.
Who would be your fundamental make-or-break character(s) that would determine whether you would attend or not? To clarify, state if you will absolutely not attend a tournament if Yoda is legal, only attend if all are legal, etc. This way, TOs can see what course of action would cost the least amount of players (any course is going to cause some people not to attend on either side).
For me, I will attend tournaments with bans solely because I need to have tournament experience to get better. However, I will continue to train against all characters and encourage my opponents in friendly play to use whoever they want.