The Christians Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
Now correct me if Im wrong or am asking a very noob question....BUT:

Isnt mormanism a form of christianity? In fact there are several religions that are considered christian but dont go by that name. Why is that?
 
HRD, yes, that's exactly right. Mormons are Christians, in that they follow the teachings of Christ, but they have some doctrines that are very contrary to the Catholic and Protestant sides of Christianity. I'm not an expert on Mormonism, so I may be butchering this, but I understand that they don't believe Jesus was the son of God in the same way that traditional Christians do. They believe he was a good man, and that by his goodness and self-sacrifice, I guess, he became a God. They believe that we can all, through following his teachings, or something, also become gods ourselves. Then they also have the extra-biblical Book of Mormon, where Jesus comes to America and visits the indians I guess. I'm sorry I haven't read it.

Edit: It's actually wilder than I thought.

There are also Jehovah's Witnesses. They don't believe in the deity of Christ either, to the point that they have their own translation of the Bible where in John 1 it says "In the beginning was the word, and the word was with God and the word was a god." Notice the "a" and the lower case "g." (http://carm.org/religious-movements/jehovahs-witnesses/john-11-word-was-god)

I suppose that's why they're not technically called Christian faiths, but I'm not sure. I'll look more deeply into it tomorrow. Were there any others you were referring to that don't call themselves Christian?
 
There's a notion that some Christians are true Christians because of how they interpret the Bible, while other Christians who interpret the Bible in unpopular ways are easily dismissed as not being True Christians. I wonder if there are True Mormons, and then the deviants. Is polygamy the True Mormonism? Polygamy/Bigamy are the only differences I've found in Mormonism. Both sides of that Mormon rift seem to participate in post-humus Baptisms which is kind of controversial. Mainly because they're Baptizing the dead by proxy regardless of what faith they devoted themselves to in their life.

And Wombat. I'm not trying to say for you to be anything but proud of your religious devotion. I hope you know I'm not trying to detract from your personal faith and how you relate to it. I just think other people of other faiths should be able to have just as deep of a belief and devotion to their faith without it being diminished for not being what your idea of faith should be.

@Suphy
Regardless of what the atheist thread spent it's time talking about, it was the atheist thread. The Christian thread has spent no less time talking about Atheism. They should have their place to discuss atheism from their perspective, we should have a place to discuss whatever religion/non religion from our perspective. Freedom for all or freedom for none.
 
HRD, yes, that's exactly right. Mormons are Christians, in that they follow the teachings of Christ, but they have some doctrines that are very contrary to the Catholic and Protestant sides of Christianity. I'm not an expert on Mormonism, so I may be butchering this, but I understand that they don't believe Jesus was the son of God in the same way that traditional Christians do. They believe he was a good man, and that by his goodness and self-sacrifice, I guess, he became a God. They believe that we can all, through following his teachings, or something, also become gods ourselves. Then they also have the extra-biblical Book of Mormon, where Jesus comes to America and visits the indians I guess. I'm sorry I haven't read it.

Edit: It's actually wilder than I thought.

There are also Jehovah's Witnesses. They don't believe in the deity of Christ either, to the point that they have their own translation of the Bible where in John 1 it says "In the beginning was the word, and the word was with God and the word was a god." Notice the "a" and the lower case "g." (http://carm.org/religious-movements/jehovahs-witnesses/john-11-word-was-god)

I suppose that's why they're not technically called Christian faiths, but I'm not sure. I'll look more deeply into it tomorrow. Were there any others you were referring to that don't call themselves Christian?

Holy crap (no pun intended) I gotta reach deep down in my brain for this one.

The whole "jesus visted some indians" thing is not right. A prophet named Moroni came to visit a person named Joesph Smith. And Moroni had some gold plates with some words of God on it. I dont think they were the commandments. They were something else IIRC.

I know some of the main differences between christianity/catholics is that some believe that God, Jesus and the holy ghost are all the same thing, and the other half thinks they are 3 seperate things. IIRC (jeez im a little embarrased now) I think the mormons believe that they are 3 seperate things. I may have that all wrong. I cant remember.
 
Well I'm a Christian and I don't think that my religion is superior. I respect every Relgion that preaches love and happiness.

UnseenWombat, you should always remember that you being born in a Muslim family would have probably resulted of you being Muslim.
 
I remember reading a while ago, there's parts of the bible that describe the events that should come to pass before the world ends, things such as natural disasters, use of greater technology, the knowledge of man increasing, mark of the beast (might be referring to RFID chips or something to be developed along the lines of that).

I think we really are living in the end times, financial crises, corrupt governments, even more frequent protests, and more wars going on, a more convincing time for the entrance for this anti-christ to bring 'world peace' and establish the new world order.


AZ
 
Holy crap (no pun intended) I gotta reach deep down in my brain for this one.

The whole "jesus visted some indians" thing is not right.
I know I gave the ultimate extreme condensed version of it, but that part is true. I'm pretty sure the "Land called Bountiful" mentioned here is the Americas. The book deals with more than that, I know. It's all about God's dealings with the ancient Native Americans. Jesus appearing was just one part.

A prophet named Moroni came to visit a person named Joesph Smith. And Moroni had some gold plates with some words of God on it. I dont think they were the commandments. They were something else IIRC.
Right, they were the books of prophets who lived in the Americas from like 1400 BC to like 400 AD or so. Moroni was the last prophet and he came back as an angel in the 1800's and appeared to Joseph Smith.

I know some of the main differences between christianity/catholics is that some believe that God, Jesus and the holy ghost are all the same thing, and the other half thinks they are 3 seperate things. IIRC (jeez im a little embarrased now) I think the mormons believe that they are 3 seperate things. I may have that all wrong. I cant remember.
Yeah, that's one of the minor differences between Catholics and Protestants and even Protestants and other Protestants. The major ones, which wars were fought over, deal with the ideas of predestination, and transsubstantiation (which I think is the silliest of the things they fought about), the idea of purgatory, the Blessed Virgin, the veneration of saints, and a ton of others.

And Wombat. I'm not trying to say for you to be anything but proud of your religious devotion. I hope you know I'm not trying to detract from your personal faith and how you relate to it. I just think other people of other faiths should be able to have just as deep of a belief and devotion to their faith without it being diminished for not being what your idea of faith should be.
Thanks, but please don't compare me to the Westboro people. I know atheists love to hold them up as examples of "crazy Christians," but in reality, they're about as far from Christianity as I am from Wicca.

UnseenWombat, how can you say that your religion is without a doubt the most superior religion if you haven't explored the teachings of other religions?

It's like saying that chocolate ice cream is the best flavored ice cream without ever having tried any other flavors.

I know you can't compare religion with ice cream, but if one were to dedicate their life to chocolate ice cream and claiming that it's superior to all others, you'd think they'd at least taste the other flavors.
A very good point. First off let me say, like I did earlier in the thread, that I don't believe everything taught by the other religions is wrong. If it's true that we're all seeing the same God, it makes sense that their teachings would have truth to them as well, and we do see a lot of the same themes in the Bible and other religious texts. Only where they differ am I saying that I accept Christianity as true and the others false. It would be dishonest not to. Either a thing is true or it isn't. Two mutually exclusive ideas can't both be right.

I know that at face value, especially looking at religions from an atheist perspective, it can look like they're all as unlikely, and therefore it doesn't matter what you believe. But there are a lot of reasons to believe Christianity as the right religion. First off, there's overwhelming historical evidence that Jesus did exist, just to get that out of the way. Jesus fulfilled a whole lot of old testament prophecies when he came to earth (at least 40, not sure of the exact number). The odds that one man would do that are astronomical. Also there's the things Jesus said about himself. No one says those types of things without them either being true, or the person being completely nuts, or lying. But anyway, the one thing we can conclude from that is that he's not simply a "great moral teacher" who was still just a man. That option is not open to us. Then finally, there's the resurrection itself. No other leader of the major religions came back from the dead like he did.

I see no such evidences for the veracity of the other religions, however, let me also state that it doesn't necessarily follow that all of their adherents are universally condemned to eternal torture like the atheists in here keep accusing. C.S. Lewis (my hero, if you haven't already gathered that) said, "Though all salvation is through Jesus, we need not conclude that He cannot save those who have not explicitly accepted Him in this life. . . . we are not pronouncing all other religions to be totally false, but rather saying that in Christ whatever is true in all religions is consummated and perfected."
 
edited

On to lighter, happier topics: How many of you Christians here go to church every week, and how many are C&E people (Christmas and Easter lol) My best friend since I was 5 is a C&E guy, but I try to go every week, especially now that I have my 2 kids.
 
I remember reading a while ago, there's parts of the bible that describe the events that should come to pass before the world ends, things such as natural disasters, use of greater technology, the knowledge of man increasing, mark of the beast (might be referring to RFID chips or something to be developed along the lines of that).

I think we really are living in the end times, financial crises, corrupt governments, even more frequent protests, and more wars going on, a more convincing time for the entrance for this anti-christ to bring 'world peace' and establish the new world order.


AZ

Fun fact about apocalyptic prophecies: they've been made throughout the history of humanity and every single one of them has been wrong. There's always been bad shit in the world and always will, just because a handful of folks with poor judgment thinks everyone not being rich means the end of the world doesn't mean it's going to happen. It happened in 999, 1666, 1999, and it's happening again this year for just a handful of a ridiculous number of examples(and don't even try including random old people desperate for attention that say the end of the world is coming in any list; that would multiply it tenfold).

This year's incorrect prediction of apocalypse? The Mayans knew astronomy and their calendar ended this year, so it has to be correct right? Tell that to the conquistadors that wiped out the Mayans before they made more of their calendar, which is divided into large segments(something in the nature of 354 years; the exact number escapes me)---one of which just happens to end this year. Oh, and the Mayans were also so advanced that they still practiced human sacrifice and one of their most advanced weapons was scarecrows with beehives in them.

Even after we pass this year's winter solstice and everyone realizes that the world hasn't exploded, there will still be another fool saying how nigh the end is. Yeah, I think I'll pass on giving them any attention.
 
That's right, even Jesus admitted that even he didn't know the exact time the end would come. Only the Father knows. He said it would be like a thief in the night though, so we have to be always ready. So living as though it will be soon is a good policy.
 
Honestly, I'm very iffy about religion talks. It's just the same old "suck my dick and be like me religion peeps" that make me fear religion talks. Sure I believe in God and follow the Christian rules, but it's not like I go flaunting around with it. I do me, follow the Christian rules since I was brought by that via my parents.

Sure peeps do other religions, but I'd like to say they aren't getting punished for worshiping differently. And I find this ironic since it appears that no religion is correct imho. I just feel religion talks can be extremely biased and very touchy. I prefer not to get into them but here I am.

All I know is I'm gonna treat religion like music. Everyone has their own preferences...

Yeah. I don't really like religious talks either. Personally, I like to talk about God not merely as a belief, but as an actual person that I have a relationship with, just like a father and his son. I'll only share from my personal experience, in how God has made himself real to me. It's like getting to know your girlfriend. The more you get to know her, the more you learn to love her. If anyone knows about relationships, then that's pretty much all there is to it with God. The rules he has in his word are to spare us uneccesary troubles that this world often throws at us. We can be our own worst enemy afterall. God will help and guide us, but only if we want him to. Otherwise, he'll back off and leave us to our own. He only wants us to freely love him. Free will is an awesome gift.

I don't like talking religion really. But rather, I like to share how great God is to me, like a son would share about his dad being a firemen, or a doctor. God just wants to be actknowledged just as anyone wants to get credited. Or even the game tournament. Anyone would love to get noticed for making the top winners. So I agree with you, on religion talks. It should be more like, "hey, God did this for me, or God did a miracle in my life." The talk just needs to be kept real. And maybe more people can aprreciate it, even if they disagree. I guess...but wherever God's influence is, we should keep in mind the devil's influence is also there to oppose him. It's like the soul swords, it's a constant battle of good vs evil. If I share about God, I know I will meet oppositions. Even the deeds of a superhero is not without oppositions from the super villians. So I won't be ashame to say that I am a Christian, and I have the answer that can be found in Jesus Christ. The bible talks about sharing the good news to the world. That's our calling, as believers. We are messengers. Not enforcers. People are free to accept or reject what we share. If we don't share the good news of Jesus's ressurection than his death on the cross would mean nothing to us believers. It's ok to share your faith in God. Let your personal experience be your great testimony. I'm sure you have an awesome testimony. ^^
 
Man, I respect you and your religion, but to say your beliefs are better because a bunch of random people with big degrees say so is insulting, especially since you're arguing with people that base their life on proof and experience, not doctrine. Now, let me ask you a question: Could you list ten reasons why you believe Christianity is superior? If not, then there is obviously no point in continuing this argument, since it's just a console war gone big.
I think I did list some reasons in another post, and have defended, for I think about 3 or 4 pages, my belief that Christianity is true. And TBH I'm really not interested in having an argument, as you put it.

Actually Wombat, I was just saying why would anyone leave a loaded gun around toddlers? Plus, Adam and Eve didn't die for a long time after being banished from the Garden.
Then you're missing the point that underlies your own analogy, which I have heard before. We're not really talking about toddlers of course, but two grown people to whom God gave free will. You were saying, whether you realized it or not, that they were incapable of making a wise decision and shouldn't have been entrusted with free will, but there was really no other option, other than for God to not create in the first place, possibly. Or to create a race of robots with no will at all. Speculating on what that might be like is completely fruitless though. We are what we are and to imagine ourselves as something else is meaningless.

To be clear, I wasn't complaining that the Bible is overcomplicated. I was complaining that the complication comes when trying to explain the outlandish claims of the Bible. But to be honest, unless you can reproduce walking on water, a talking burning bush, a magical fruit, a 900+ year old living human being, a talking snake, and 30,000 feet of water I'm going to side with current evidence.
So you're getting hung up on the stories rather than the underlying principles behind them. Maybe that's the problem. You're not seeing the forest for the trees so to speak.

To me, a valid explanation doesn't sound more outlandish the more you simplify it. See: Scalar and tensor perturbations arising in an inflationary braneworld scenario driven by a single scalar field are considered, where the bulk on either side of the brane corresponds to Anti-de Sitter spaces with different cosmological constants. A consistency relation between the two spectra is derived and found to have an identical form to that arising in standard single-field inflation based on conventional Einstein gravity. The dS/CFT correspondence may provide further insight into the origin of this degeneracy. Possible ways of lifting such a degeneracy are discussed.
- I have no idea what the hell any of that means. Maybe something about an experiment that resulted in symmetry on both a quantum and relative level. But if someone simplified it for me I could probably get the gist of it. The gist of religion is to believe in explanations written a long time ago, in cultures we will never truly understand, despite the growth of knowledge and changing explanations due to that growth of knowledge. Honestly, Atheist texts go back as far as 600BC. I highly doubt how they explained things would seem very plausible today either.j
That is why we have so many theodicies that you denounced as complicated hearsay written over the course of 2000 years. You just said that the thoughts on atheism have changed, why would you expect the thoughts on Christianity to stay the same?
 
Let me say this...this thread is not about arguing. Its about Christians discussing their faith and people who are interested in learning more about it to post questions. Grilling somebody over something that your not going to believe anyway is stupid and is only going to make it harder on the people who are interested in learning about Christianity.

So I'm deleting anything that isn't constructive to this thread and I'm going to start handing out infractions if it starts to get stupid.
 
People are silly, religion IS used as weapon, but this is not blame of all christians , as a christian i recognize that something are indeed wrong, but you don t blame a group for they "leaders" i mean it is not like we agree with every position they take, we just try to do the rigth things, in our concepition anyway
 
Well I go to church rarely, I don't find it important. Listening to an old priest babbling is so boring.
Haha, okay, I see. So you said priest; am I right to assume you're Catholic? I've never actually went to a regular Catholic service, just that one Greek Orthodox christening, oh, and a wedding at the same place. My Grandfather was Catholic though. I should go just to see what a regular Sunday service is like. The Greek parts threw me off the 2 times I went.

I imagine it's probably sorta like the Lutheran liturgy. Since they're the oldest denominations. I was raised in the Lutheran Church and the services were kinda dry I guess. They really did teach me a lot about the Bible though.
 
I imagine it's probably sorta like the Lutheran liturgy. Since they're the oldest denominations. I was raised in the Lutheran Church and the services were kinda dry I guess. They really did teach me a lot about the Bible though.
They are indeed very dry, but not as much a a Lutheran liturgy (which I think is the coldest it gets).
 
I don't sit in on the actual "Church" part but some of those theologies have good party's. Something about playing quarters with a Priest is...novel!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom