Cla
LET'S FIGHTING!
But that's not true. I can't see the difference in the launch reaction of 33(B) on NH vs CH. But either way, you can definitely combo into AAB on 33(B) NH. It does seem to be slightly more difficult than CH, but it's definitely doable.NH 33(B) launches the opponent forward, so it's impossible to combo into AAB.
EDIT: I just saw what Dest said...
Still doesn't make sense that it does less on CH than NH. Because now if you legitimately interrupt an opponent's attack, you now get less damage because of some arbitrary decision that "Viola does too much damage".And what Ryder said is a bit false. The damage reduction lies in the 44A BE, not the 33B (You can test this with the same method but using the 6B+K on 2nd orb hit into 6B 3B version of the combo). It's probably like this because the move is meant to catch step, not hit on NH. They probably decided damage for the followup could get too high, so they put some damage reduction for CH states. And tbh, they were right. ATM she already gets about 120 just for killing your step.