Non-competitive players create tier lists because they're smarter than the jock high-execution guys? I don't think that's what you meant to say and I'm sure I've taken it out of context.....
Yes, out of context, but still close. They don't do it BECAUSE they're smarter, they do it because you don't need to be a competitive player to analyze the tools and data that contribute to making a tier list. Tier lists are all about maximum potential, in a vacuum where no mistakes are allowed. Tournament players do not exhibit this, no one does.
I also gave you an example of a competitive player that has failed repeatedly in placing characters anywhere close to their actual tier. Like I said, you don't have to be a theorycrafter to be an excellent fighting game player, but you do if you want to make tier lists.
<snip>The game evolves on your own whether or not you're making fluffy posts on a forum about how good you think someone should be.
Yep, the game does evolve, and it only hinders the process if people don't share their opinion. Why is it such a common occurrence for people to say "GIVE THE GAME TIME DONT SHARE YOUR OPINION" if it doesn't hurt anyone, and only helps? Time is not a factor whatsoever. Two years down the line people will still be saying the same kind of statements. Five years, Ten years, afaik MVC2 is still evolving and changing their tier lists
Tier lists don't reflect the skilled execution of all characters - only a confidence rating.<snip>
Not sure what you're trying to argue here, tier lists aren't based around tournament results, tournament results are only a reflection of the skill of the players that were there, not the maximum potential of all characters.
I skipped most of your post, but I'm glad to see we agree on this.
Again, taken out of context, I was merely saying thats what you were trying to state. I don't agree whatsoever, and i've already stated why
Anyway i'm done here, I seem to have forgotten how many hoops a person has to go through only to end up at step one of a discussion.