Maybe there's a language barrier here.
If you say "mix-up" you're implying that you're actually going to switch things up on your opponent in an effort to confuse them. Hitting someone with a shakable stun and then doing a mid, or a different mid, or maybe a third mid, is only confusing because it makes no sense.
Well the confusing part is when people think that all i put in my vid are combos, even my mixups arent combos as in, they arent meant to be a set, i just show them as one cause why not, it looks cool and its possible, im not saying you should use them against a opponent in a cash-win-tourney cause you (i mean you in general btw not you you) dont have the underlying psychology that i utilize this system with.
Waiting for someone to shake a stun and then throwing them is actually a mix-up. You're switching between the combo they think they're trying to escape, and a throw. Once they're afraid of the throw you can go back to your combo, since they'll either shake and duck (letting you hit them with a mid) or not shake at all (trying to stop your throw or reduce the damage). Now you've created some yomi: do I shake the stun and eat a throw or a low? Do I not shake the stun and avoid the throw or take reduced damage from the low?
Well i was just showing off possibilitys, not something that belongs in its place. Ofcourse i could do a low, or i could do a throw but im showing followups (additional stuns from moves on a stun instead of ending the stun, and by preference keeping the opponent standing, and if not atleast having a way to use the opponents state to your advantage) the big difference between this and consistent combos is that consistent combos are a set of moves that 'do' belong together to be effective, stungames do not, cause they áre breakable and thats known troughout the whole world, its pure logic that a stungame cant be treated as a combo therefore not as a solid mixup, and it is no solid mixup. Thats why its stungames & mixups and not stunmixups or muxstupemps ... or something.. things..
Do I shake and crouch, which will avoid your throw and block any lows? Now I'm open getting hit by a quick mid. This is a decision your opponent must make in the split second window they have to actually shake your stun.
Oh i thought the quote ... nvr mind..
So, it's true that shakable stuns aren't as useless as some people think, but what you're doing is neither useful, nor a mix-up.
I know, its nothing.. but at the same time its everything, im afraid im the only person who can comprehend its worth, and i woudlnt want any different. You see the thing is (didnt i explain this already btw.. uhh) i know consistent combos i just dont utilize them myself, i use them agianst people passively, my knowledge of consistent combos that is.
And thats exactly why i dont use consistent combos myself cause thats part of my mindgame.
Edit: What is this Rock RO bug you speak of, anyways?
Well i do it in the vid, so its not hard to figure out. Look at where i stand when i use the floor throw, that couldnt have RO'ed by itself to begin with, look what i do to force a RO.
