And I'm telling you that it is. Do I need to explain again?
Then that becomes a problem. You only have casual exp which limits your way of thinking about real competitions and what real good competitors are. You have been fooled into thinking that flashy moves makes a good player, but it only makes the player look good. Such as thinking that he can execute his iGDR consistantely so well. What if the opponent offline constantly is good at blocking at iGDR and can punish it very well? Then what you would consider that Cervy player then?
You are a decent player in your own imaginary world along with some casuals that agree with you. But then again there are some other casuals who have their own definition of what a real good player is.
So what if you have more exp in SC than I have, it really depends on the type of exp. The big difference is practicing with extremely good players and that surpasses any type of practice. There are also good players that I haven't heard, but why not get a little acquainted with them. Cuz from those players I hear that they practice with extremely good players. And how we define good players is not by being good online, welcome to the forums.