Rusted Blade
[14] Master
I don't know, it seems to me that Take 2 would be a decent steward of WB Games (whatever they end up being called after the fact); maybe I am just not up on the most recent developments over recent years, but Take 2 has always had a pretty healthy relationship with it's developers and allowed them creative freedom without much interference to foist nickel and dimeing features into their games? I mean, at least, it's hard for me to lump them in with EA and Activision, who are clearly the two worst actors in the industry in this regard. Anyway, I am kind of suspicious of this rumour anyway, WB is a media conglomerate and having invested a lot of money into WBIE in order to direct develop products based on their own IP rather licensing it out, I'm not sure it makes much sense for them to sell it now, when from all indications it has been pretty profitable.Holy fuck, there are rumors talking about WB games would be bought by EA, activation or Take 2
Damn somebody save Rocksteady from being bought by some trash, the 3 Batman games were all Masterpieces.
PS: NRS are good, but i didn't like the fact that they gone woke with MK11, so i care less about them, but if somebody can save and do great MK games, i'm all in.
It would also be a complicated sell for any company large enough to consider the purchase, since a lot of the IP in the portfolio is tied to licenses of property that WB is going to retain ownership of: it would be very complex to work out the licenses for continued publication of existing games, let alone further entries in those franchises. Companies do get over those aversions at times and make the deal work if one is very committed to streamlining their corporate structure and assets and another sees enough potential profit, but even so, this one would really surprise me.
Because they stand to make much more money from a new release than from any one port. I mean, they're not going to indefinitely postpone a new game in the franchise and the maintenance of forward momentum until they have all the older games in the franchise on all current platforms. I mean, since when has any company approached such a situation in that manner? A long-running series always gets stretched across numerous platforms, and while that's changing a little now (the industry is bending increasingly towards the nostalgia/perfect collection impulse), I don't find it particularly surprising that they are moving ahead with the most recent entry before lining up remasters of all previous titles. Then again, I'm not super familiar with the development and publication history of the Yakuza franchise, so maybe there are other factors here I just don't get which are informing your surprise.no Yakuza aside from 7 later this year is... not so good. I don't have any plans to play 7 before 3-6, not sure why they're doing it in this way.