The Turbanator
[11] Champion
Didn't Max say he's doing something like that?
Soul Calibur VI: General discussion
- Thread starter SSfox
- Start date
Norik
[14] Master
In all honesty I'm not sure he'd be the best man for the job. He doesn't know much about Calibur outside of mashing 3B with SC2 Nightmare.
mira
[09] Warrior
PW started making some decent SC -> <- Tekken 7 tutorials a while back, I'm sure he could put together a decent guide.
It wouldn't be too hard.
Explain the basics (movement, buttons, notation etc)
Explain GI, Reversal Edge, and Lethal Hit
Explain meter
Explain throws and teching
Brief character rundowns
More advanced fundamentals (just frames, whatever the new replacement for just guard is, more advanced movement stuff, stage positioning & how to keep in mind what options your opponent might want depending on the position in the stage)
etc. etc... I'm sure someone could pull it off
CFW
[13] Hero
Yeah it’s just fan made stuff.
Maedhros
[12] Conqueror
Or he could borrow from those fabulous tutorials on this forum. I don't think anyone would hold it against him if the series' reputation is on the line.
FleshMasher
[13] Hero
How about an in-game tutorial, with good owld Olcadan? Was a good teacher IMO.
The Turbanator
[11] Champion
Bamco:
masterROBOMAN
[11] Champion
Actually, on the first interviews about SC6, Okubo teased in-game tutorial for it. And they DO in-game tutorials in previous SC titlesBamco:
The Turbanator
[11] Champion
SCIII was the only one with a tutorial.
Blackout
[12] Conqueror
No, SC Broken Destiny had a tutorial mode called Gauntlet.
Icarii
[09] Warrior
Then maybe they should skip an in-game tutorial so they can balance the game correctly instead!
Rex Dart
[12] Conqueror
That's not true.
SoulCalibur's Mission Mode began with EdgeMaster teaching you how to attack, block, throw, etc. And SoulCalibur II's Weapon Master Mode began the same way.
I think those absolutely count as tutorials, even if they're a part of a larger single-player mode. In many ways I think this is a better approach than making it a separate mode that players might ignore.
thenewperson
Fighter
IIRC, SCIV was the only one without some sort of tutorial.
Pyrrus
[14] Master
tbh Elysium and Pyrrha Omega were my faves from SCV
Synalon
[12] Conqueror
I liked Viola a lot. Really interesting style. Lots of people loathed her but she placed higher than any other SCV newcomer on the popularity poll if I recall. I hope the rumours about Amy just being Viola/having her style are true since then she's probably going to be in the game, at least as DLC.
Controversial opinion alert lol
Controversial opinion alert lol
Alucard
Premium Member
I agree with you about Viola but I don't want her to remplace anyone, whisfull thinking I don't want any character to remplace anyone.
Zenit
[10] Knight
I really hope in a SC1 or SC2 Astaroth. No stupid mech, no horrible golems, frankensteins or something like that.
Last edited:
Ardenwolf
[12] Conqueror
The only reason I loathe Viola is the whole replacing Amy as a fencer thing. As long as Viola stays a separate character I don't mind her.
fallacie
[12] Conqueror
Sieg and Nightmare are the same person but with different slots/movesets, the same could happen for ViolAmy. Viola doesn’t have to replace Amy to still be Amy
DanteSC3
[14] Master
I still wouldn't really expect Viola for this game, unless she's literally the last DLC character of the bunch. Even including Amy is a bit of a stretch, when we still don't have Raphael confirmed just yet. They may save her for the next game, either way. But we may see both forms there.