RyujiSakamoto
Premium Member
hoping the 9th's soulcalibur stream will give us some good info
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If they reveal Hwang and he uses Yun-Seong's moveset
Looking forward to seeing what will be announced this coming livestream. I wonder if they will reveal new stages there or maybe they will reveal Hwang.
If I were to be real honest though, I have never really played a SoulCalibur game with Hwang in it aside from emulating SoulCalibur III: Arcade Edition and I could honestly care less about his character BUT his moveset is very valuable to me. Assassin was my favorite character to play in SoulCalibur II and knowing the fact that Hwang is who his moveset is based on is enough for me to want Hwang back in the game. I really miss that moveset, neither Xianghua nor Yun-Seong felt fun for me to play in SoulCalibur II.
If they reveal Hwang and he uses Yun-Seong's moveset, I will sadly be disappointed. I would rather see Yun-Seong return with the same moveset Hwang and Assassin have than the other way around.
![]()
I'll have a long violent talk with Okubo if that happens. That or I'm just going to cry for hours.Hwang with Yun-seong's moveset would be a travesty worse than Xiba's existence.
Fair enough, and true. Cassandra's profile taken by itself isn't clear, but when you mix it with Sophitia's, it does frame the event as taking place in 1590. Which also ties into Crimzin's question, below. The Owl Shield didn't see use after SoulBlade, since Sophitia already had replaced it with the Elk Shield by SoulCalibur I. Though this does raise an interesting question, however... are there two Omega Swords? And if so, why? Cassandra's sword was differentiated as Digamma Sword starting with SoulCalibur III, though it looks practically identical to the Omega Sword. Kind of a weird discrepancy all of a sudden. I would mostly chalk it up to the fact that Sophitia wasn't supposed to be in SoulCalibur II originally, so she wouldn't also have the Omega Sword in the original version of the game, but SoulCalibur VI is also replicating this, since Sophitia definitely has an Omega Sword, and so too is the one that Cassandra gets at the shrine... but I didn't really mean to get off topic! This is for sure a change, then, in that case. I still move that it doesn't have any strong implications moving forward, unless Cassandra takes some sort of action to prevent the future from happening, though. It remains to be seen.
But it's probably just referring to Hwang. He's the most obvious that's been gone the longest.So resurrection can apply to many characters!
I would... if I had Twitter. But I'm never getting Twitter, so someone else will have to do it for me... ... ...@LisaK?when hwang isn't in the season pass, I hope the people who were so fervently insisting he was in take their pitchforks to Project Soul/Okubo on twitter for giving them the hope that Hwang would be in.![]()
blocking you right now..
View attachment 64686
concerning the "resurrection" thing from okubo.
The game series was dead for 4-6 years. That's a long time for any character so it could be anyone.
Li Long: gone for 22 years from the story. 13 years since SC3AE
Hwang: gone for 20 years from the story. 13 years since SC3AE
Yunseong, Setsuka, Rock, Lizardman: gone for 10 years, style for Sets in V.
Dampierre, Aeon, Algol: gone for 7 years.
Hilde: gone for 5 years (lost swords)
So resurrection can apply to many characters!
This will happen.when hwang isn't in the season pass, I hope the people who were so fervently insisting he was in take their pitchforks to Project Soul/Okubo on twitter
Ehh, I think you need to re-read my last post, because I specifically reference the fact that this is not the basis for my perspective. Yes, in a story that was at all serious about its continuity and believability, it would definitely be the case that changes to the course of events would accumulate and take on a life of their own: once you introduce the element of time travel into your story, you have to face the basic feature of reality that small changes to a system will be amplified over time. That's a simple, unavoidable consequence of the law of entropy. But again, this is pulp fiction of the most simple and goofy variety: it would be entirely possible that the writers may choose to have events take radical left turns early in this new timeline, and then be perfectly identical to the old timeline further on. As little sense as that would make as a rational matter, that could easily happen in a story like this.@Rusted Blade....while you're on the side of the start is different, so everything else that follows must also be different.
That's really a pretty meaningless distinction though; it doesn't matter how you label the excursion, nor is it relevant how far Cassie went: the question is, have events played out differently as a consequence of the visit by the Ghost of Cassandra's Future. And the answer to that question is a clear "yes". Nobody had to step a foot outside of Athens for that to be the case and for the possibility/liklihood of major changes in the course of events being a direct consequence.I take opposition to your statement that Cassandra has "set out" anywhere yet, she has not. She has only patrolled the area around Greece, until Sophitia got back.
the story is clearly being set up to take things in a different direction, and (as discussed on the previous page) certainly has changed already in some details; and C) they are literally telling us now in the story's own voice that things have changed/are going to change further!
Unless the genders are reversed, and the first child is a boy, and the second child is a girl, and boy Pyrrha is named Deucalion this time, I kinda doubt it would happen. But then, what does girl Patroklos get named instead? Does Lucius get to name her after his favorite bread?I think Patroklos should be malfested, not Pyrrha.![]()
It's hard to know for sure what the consequences will be, but its pretty much a very express rejection of the idea that we are looking at a closed continuity loop. Although, to be clear, that was never likely to be the case, even before they added that line: one of the main themes of this series going back to the beginning is the idea that human will is the bee's knees and can shape the very course of history/nature of reality. As clumsily- and vaguely-invoked as that theme has typically been, there is no question that it is a driving principle of the story. The idea that writers of this, of all series, would go out on an artistic limb to repeat the same plots of several games in their entirety, over multiple new entries (despite the consequences for game design and marketability) and that our tragic heroes (some of whom now time travel!) would be locked into an existential nightmare defined more by themes of fatalism and determinism...that was just never, ever going to happen.Yeah in that ending, I was under the impression it was simply showing how Pyrrha got her name.
Then the announcer spoke, I'm under the impression Cassandra could potentially name both children or perhaps she tries taking charge of them to stop Sophitia from doing anything like in Soulcalibur 4.