JohnMcKee
[14] Master
The story seems to go from 1583 to 1589, nothing points toward it going further in time.Did the story mode info not reveal the game would cover SCI-III? I may have misheard it but I'm fairly sure it was revealed to do so.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The story seems to go from 1583 to 1589, nothing points toward it going further in time.Did the story mode info not reveal the game would cover SCI-III? I may have misheard it but I'm fairly sure it was revealed to do so.
Did the story mode info not reveal the game would cover SCI-III? I may have misheard it but I'm fairly sure it was revealed to do so.
Okubo has mentioned multiple times that the game will at least go up to SCII, also, let's not forget that this is a reboot! So, that means events that previously happened during SCII - SCIV in 1591 could possibly happen at a much earlier date.When I was watching the E3 stream a few days ago, nothing was mentioned about the story going further than SCI and the timeline screenshot only goes up to 1590 while SCII starts at 1591.
Okubo has mentioned multiple times that the game will at least go up to SCII, also, let's not forget that this is a reboot! So, that means events that previously happened during SCII - SCIV in 1591 could possibly happen at a much earlier date.
The fact that in one of the first interviews Okubo said "The keyword here is reboot" shows that it's highly likely that later events could happen earlier and that the story could possibly change/go on further than what we know right now.
It's like you've never seen this thread before.Ya’ll really out here nitpicking at interviews when I’m just here trying to be excited at what they’re trying to get us to expect out of the game xP
Short answer: yes.Explain III? Apparently it was broken?
Unplayably so for many, to the point where the scene for that game evaporated within mere months. It was full of bugs, infinites, straight up physics-breaking glitches, and the roster was abysmally unbalanced—not to mention the memory card corruption issue. The game was clearly not playtested. Arcade Edition fixed nearly all of the game's issues, but barely anyone played that.Explain III? Apparently it was broken?
For posterity the game should be called "Soulcalibug".Explain III? Apparently it was broken?
Unplayably so for many, to the point where the scene for that game evaporated within mere months. It was full of bugs, infinites, straight up physics-breaking glitches, and the roster was abysmally unbalanced—not to mention the memory card corruption issue. The game was clearly not playtested. Arcade Edition fixed nearly all of the game's issues, but barely anyone played that.