DanteSC3
[14] Master
I want to go back in time and delete whoever came up with the concept of original and new timeline. It’s nonsense. There is only one timeline.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Considering it was never 100% confirmed that Viola was Amy, only hinted at, they could still do what they want with them.One of the things I keep hearing from this site is that SC6 follows a new timeline and the developers can do anything they want to the characters. People especially believe this, because of Zasalamel's inclusion. But so far, we've seen little to no deviation from the original plot. Hell, Kilik's "evil transformation" as always a thing. We're just seeing in gameplay-wise for the first time. I have no reason to believe that they'll separate Amy from Viola. In fact, wouldn't it be a shock if the events of SCV were still going to happen? I also think the word "reboot" as been diluted here, since SCV. This game is a prequel, not a straight-up reboot.
But... Doing so would actually create two timelines!I want to go back in time and delete whoever came up with the concept of original and new timeline. It’s nonsense. There is only one timeline.
None of that means actually changing anything.I mean, if you really want to bring it up then... The general definition for a reboot in fiction is "Described as a way to "rebrand" or "restart an entertainment universe that has already been established" and more-so in video games "Reboots in video games are used to refresh the storyline and elements of the game." As well as "For audiences, reboots allow easier entry for newcomers unfamiliar with earlier titles in a series."
And Soulcalibur VI is doing just that (especially the latter). If you don't agree then cool but lets not continue this discussion here once again and take it to inbox or make a thread.
But... a reboot.... would create..... a new timeline..... Eh, like I said useless argument, let's just leave it we really don't need to clog up the thread :/The claim was it being a new timeline, which it isn't
This whole thing about the roster really reminds me when we all didn’t wanna believe in 3 mimics, but then it turned out to be true and we thought that the middle two slots were Zas and Talim
Couldn't the center slot be just an online timer?Oh wow, Inferno not being in the center is kind of a big deal. That means there are still two slots ( we already know were Tira is) and the remaining season pass characters are 3. This is confusing. Either the last two slots are indeed unlockable or they're just gonna add a third slot with the day patch and reserve all 3 for DLC. But none of those would make sense lol. Why would they make Hwang/Yun of all characters unlockable? or is it going to be Lizzy and Edge Master? And if it's DLC then would they really forget to add an extra slot? ... this is gonna one tiring last week to endure.
Edit to add Tira just cause:
View attachment 51912
Buuuuuuuuuuut that can indeed be a fake pic, although it looks pretty legit. I'm sure everything will leak tomorrow or after tomorrow and we'll know for sure if there ARE still unlockable characters or those last 2 slots remain empty for DLC.
This.I wonder whether arcade mode was rushed late in development and that's the reason for lack of proper character select screen - the game had to go gold and they ran out of time - Maybe day one patch will fix it.
Just seems insane to me.
where is it at?
a reboot does not entail a new timelineBut... a reboot.... would create..... a new timeline..... Eh, like I said useless argument, let's just leave it we really don't need to clog up the thread :/
Inferno? Top left corner.
I don't think you see the normal character select screen in any online mode. You probably get the same selection screen as the Network Test for all online modes.Couldn't the center slot be just an online timer?