- Thread starter
- #81
RyujiSakamoto
Premium Member
Because the predominantly male fanbase is straight and prefers tiddies, to put it one way.
Silver slot confirmed
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Because the predominantly male fanbase is straight and prefers tiddies, to put it one way.
You think any of the SCV kids have a chance?View attachment 68317
Silver slot confirmed
If they were going to bring in any of the SCV newbies it would be Viola.You think any of the SCV kids have a chance?
Kids? NoYou think any of the SCV kids have a chance?
You think any of the SCV kids have a chance?
Yeah, true, she was the only well-received newcomer. However, they would have pull something to reboot her in which would be drastic. Like having Azwel make an adult clone of Amy or something, which yeah, I can see after the Viola teaser in her story.If they were going to bring in any of the SCV newbies it would be Viola.
It's a reboot, though I know you won't accept it, everyone else has. They don't need to worry about those things because reboots are all about changing the continuity. If they want to reboot Viola by making an adult clone of Amy courtesy of Azwel, then what's to stop them? I was actually hoping some people would respond to what I said before you inevitably showed up.Viola would break continuity, otherwise I'd be all for her coming back for the grey/silver slot. I'd much rather see Z.W.E.I., though, at least to have a full answer on his backstory instead of it being shrouded in mystery. I wouldn't say Z.W.E.I. was necessarily poorly-received, it's just that he was legitimately and objectively awful to play as, because he didn't get enough love to be buffed post-launch as he desperately needed. He had potential, he just wasn't capable of standing a real chance stacked up to everyone else. Design-wise, yay, but gameplay... eh. Cool idea, poor execution.
Dafuq?Don't forget that the new character select screen background represents the holy roman empire. The pink slot could go to pyrrha or pat because they are holy warriors
You should really stop projecting yourself onto "everyone", because "everyone" has definitely not accepted the reboot status of the game, as I explained previously. Making an adult clone of Amy would clash with what was shown already. Azwel clearly projected Amy's future being Viola, it's not rocket science to figure that out. If it were a reboot and they could do whatever they wanted, sure, but the evidence is still weighing heavily on it not being a reboot because of their repeated insistence on remaining true to the original plot.It's a reboot, though I know you won't accept it, everyone else has. They don't need to worry about those things because reboots are all about changing the continuity. If they want to reboot Viola by making an adult clone of Amy courtesy of Azwel, then what's to stop them? I was actually hoping some people would respond to what I said before you inevitably showed up.
Le sigh.
You should really stop projecting yourself onto "everyone", because "everyone" has definitely not accepted the reboot status of the game, as I explained previously. Making an adult clone of Amy would clash with what was shown already. Azwel clearly projected Amy's future being Viola, it's not rocket science to figure that out. If it were a reboot and they could do whatever they wanted, sure, but the evidence is still weighing heavily on it not being a reboot because of their repeated insistence on remaining true to the original plot.
But me responding doesn't mean other people can't respond. My response doesn't and never has invalidated anyone else's response. There's really no need to be so defensive with regards to my posts, and you should lighten up a bit, for everyone's sake.
Ok, fine. Not everyone.You should really stop projecting yourself onto "everyone", because "everyone" has definitely not accepted the reboot status of the game, as I explained previously. Making an adult clone of Amy would clash with what was shown already. Azwel clearly projected Amy's future being Viola, it's not rocket science to figure that out. If it were a reboot and they could do whatever they wanted, sure, but the evidence is still weighing heavily on it not being a reboot because of their repeated insistence on remaining true to the original plot.
But me responding doesn't mean other people can't respond. My response doesn't and never has invalidated anyone else's response. There's really no need to be so defensive with regards to my posts, and you should lighten up a bit, for everyone's sake.
How many times do I have to point out that the changes were minimal because the game of focus is the fucking Golden Age of SC? You don't fuck with that. However, there are numerous deviations, including the two big ones that I thought for sure would convince you, yet you just keep trucking on.If it were a reboot and they could do whatever they wanted, sure, but the evidence is still weighing heavily on it not being a reboot because of their repeated insistence on remaining true to the original plot.
SCV could be considered canon, but it's clearly established as an alternate timeline to be avoided. So if you want to go with that sense, it's not a full-on reboot as the old continuity still exists, but isn't the one we're going through now.I don't think it's a "reboot" as it carries the VI in it's name. It's a "pivot" away from the bad story beats of SCV.
SCV still happened but SCVI can be them "avoiding" the dark fate that occurs. Or SCVI can lead to them "fixing" the dark fate. A full "reboot" though? No I don't think so.
Why do you think that?
As I said, "seniority" doesn't mean jack shit because most of them aren't marketable as DLC. I can't see them closing out on freaking Rock (cue the hate comments). What do you think of that post regarding the interview above? Seems kinda suspicious.
Ok, fine. Not everyone.
Just 99% barring outliers such as yourself.
How many times do I have to point out that the changes were minimal because the game of focus is the fucking Golden Age of SC? You don't fuck with that. However, there are numerous deviations, including the two big ones that I thought for sure would convince you, yet you just keep trucking on.
SCV could be considered canon, but it's clearly established as an alternate timeline to be avoided. So if you want to go with that sense, it's not a full-on reboot as the old continuity still exists, but isn't the one we're going through now.
You know why I get so angry at you with this? It's because I can't have even one, and I mean one motherfucking conversation about this without you instantly jumping in with this bullshit. Every fucking time.99% is still far too high. If I'm being bold to assume to try and speak for the entirety of the fanbase, I would say a more accurate representation is probably only about 10% even cares about the story at large to begin with, so in that being the case, the 1%, if you're saying is right, is more like 10% of folks who care about the story. I'm not the only one even on this site who doesn't believe in the reboot, so in other communities, I'm sure there are dozens and dozens more of us out there who can read between the lines and connect the dots of our murky future. Just accepting it's a reboot is too easy, when there's so many connected threads of things that are loyal to the original, paired with hints dropped about the future, for SoulCalibur II through SoulCalibur V. Including SoulCalibur V being the important part, not leaving it out in the cold.
I look forward to SoulCalibur VII finally settling this dispute one way or the other, honestly. But whoever came up with the "original timeline" and "new timeline" concepts, admitted them as fact, and spread that across the internet committed a premature judgment in my opinion, and due to its inclusion on the wiki, which some take as law, even though it is only created by fans, not officially backed by Namco or Project Soul in any capacity, it's caused a bias against the very real possibility that there is only one timeline, and emboldens folks such as yourself to call out those who see it the way I do as foolish, instead of rationally debating why it could or could not be the case. It is completely uncertain one way or the other, for now, and both sides might be right, at a completely equal 50-50 chance. That's my stance, anyway.