DINO:
Sophitia:
Ramon said:
Ramon = #1 Sophitia in the states!
He is also a NY member and a sparring partner whom I compete with all the time. In the past I had this as an even matchup 5/5 IMO. The problem was 236236B, 236236:B.
Sophitia has no mixup; Kilik has a billion. kB, 2A, 1_3B+K, 2K. She can't punish any except 2K (-14-Frames) which has to be anticipated since its a fast low. The double 236B combo is non-existent when u pressure her leaving her no room to execute at tip range in which the combo activates. So tell me without that what is she gonna do in this matchup without that, a mixup, and nothing to punish besides 2K. Last but not least this matchup is one of the most constant ones I have experience with and u don't. Please speak objectively!
Mitsu:
I think Belial and Rekki are more than qualified to tell u his placing more than u. Belial #1 Mitsu & Rekki #2 Mitsu. More importantly those are there mains. Its possible however than Mitsu can be top 10 but even I think most know that Amy is better than Mitsu overall outside of that particular matchup. Again please speak objectively.
Voldo:
For the Kilik vs. Voldo matchup i'm not gonna argue with u as u are a notable Voldo. However I think u whiffed a fairly recent post in this thread made by me which in turn makes u sound stupid for the theory fighter comment. Why?
Page #29 - Post 569; Go back and read before just jumping in and making random comments.
I clearly stated the change in a 5/5 to a 6/4 is based off of results. I have played a number of Voldo's now but to keep things the most accurate I mentioned notable Voldo's.
Manta-Esom-AlphaMale-Bibulous who are all notable Voldo's and all play him differently. Manta is ground focused, Esom is heavy on his BT Stance, AlphaMale is the tried and true mixup between his unseeable safe lows that get everyone and some minor tricks, Bibulous does all the above occassionally. The results speak different form theoretical as Kilik has edged out all of them fairly easy by a noticeable margin except Manta which was a dead tie. This is taking player skill into consideration and mostly speaking about how the matchup plays itself out and not a reflection of who is better than who.. Finally there is a margin of error here that is a possibility.
Ivy:
The same rules that apply to the above Voldo about whiffing the post. I clearly stated that I once thought this matchup was 3/7 for Ivy and then overtime 4/6 and I still kinda think she beats him. However
results proved different as the #1 Ivy Malek (SCIV) and I have tested this matchup to death and in the end when things got serious I beat him 3-2 in MM's. He also thinks this is a 6/4 or 5/5. Linkrkc also thinks this matchup is 5/5 and what little games we played was a tie. Woahhzz also thinks this a 5/5 another Ivy that I generally tie with if not a slightly better record. Ring also thinks this is a 5/5. All top notch notable Hilde's.
So what that comes down to is results and consideration of other peoples opinion not just coming into the thread and saying this and that.
Finally my matches are tried and tested. Read the F'ing post because I feel u made me waste time writing this shit. All of my matchups are combined opinions, results, and a little theoretical (Setsuka, Tira).
In an effort to speed the process up of making a tier list can u please leave until u come back and read shit before u post. Most appreciated!