I'm real confident with these developers now; almost (ALMOST) everything I heard from this blog, I liked.
For example, with this: "With Natsu, I JG the second hit of Pyrrhas’ BB, and I punish with garanteed AA"
That is awesome. You look at a sc4 tournament, and you see players taking turns doing BB, AA, B, whatever, right? All that's safe and there's no real mind game to it, its just wait and see when someone risks a more unsafe move. That 'after you, no no, after you' type of play WAS a boring aspect to the game.
This quote shows that there will be more mind games going on -- no more mindless BB spam. Now, you have to make that decision as the attacker -- go for single B and be safe from JG? Exploit my opponents use of JG and go for a throw/low? Use BB to keep my opponent honest, who hasn't used JG? Of course, I might be wrong, but how is that NOT good? It seems to make unused strings, like Xianghua's AAB, AA4B6B worth trying out again.
I was kinda hoping that she would've had a first look at Leixia, but I guess her model wasn't ready yet.... :(
The only thing I didn't like (or, rather, hated) was the prospect of yet another overpowered Ivy. GUARANTEED grab CE?? No start-up (from what I read)?! Huge damage payoff? That's straight garbage; that should be painfully obvious that there should be some kind of risk to using it. I also wish that they keep just a little bit of the execution barrier up for characters like Natsu and Ivy, but hey; that's me.