These lists are cool, here is my view:
Top tier - Cervantes
High tier - Alpha Pat, Mitsurugi, Algol, Astaroth, Pyrrha, Ivy, Nightmare, Yoshimitsu, Patroklos,
Voldo, Siegfried, Leixia, Natsu, Maxi, , Xiba, Aeon, Tira, Zwei, Raphael, Pyrrha Omega, Viola, Ezio, Hilde
Mid tier - None
Low tier - None
? tier : Dampierre
Some points:
- High tier differences are small enough for me not to care / be able to make differences
- What can I say, Cervy took this SC edition
- Dampierre is weird
- Zwei, Siegfried, and Aeon players need to step up their game
- Could this the be the most accurate list so far? Me thinks so
How is this accurate at all? Algol(maybe), Astaroth, Pyrrha, Ivy, NM, Yoshi, Pat, Voldo, Sieg, Leix, Natsu, Maxi, Xiba, Aeon, Tira, ZWEI, Raphael. How are ANY OF THESE BETTER THAN PYRRHA OMEGA OR VIOLA? Also, you cant have only 2 tiers with 1 character in 1 tier and 23 characters in the other? What you are saying is that aside from Cervy, the whole cast is even. Wow. First of all, learn that tiers are based on data(Frames, range, damage, spacing, meter use, meter gain, RO game, mixup, wakeup, techtraps, throws, evasion, guard crush properties, and combo length(The ability to choose how long the combo you are going to do is to waste time to get a times up(Viola and Astaroth can do this amazingly))) not the player or else that would mean Talim and Zas were Top tier in 4(Kura and Omega). Also, 'most accurate list so far' NOT A CHANCE. A MUCH more accurate tier list(In order to) would be,
Top: aPat, Cervy, Mitsurugi, Omega, Viola, Algol.
Upper mid: Patroklos or Pyrrha, Astaroth or Ivy, Nightmare, Voldo.
Mid: Natsu, Hilde, Tira.
Lower mid: Aeon, Xiba, Leixia, Siegfried or Maxi, Ezio.
Bottom: Z.W.E.I., Raphael, Dampierre.
