let's sum up:
- Obviously, if I submit an illiterate wish list - the authors of the game will decide that I am a troll or crazy.
I asked for help a month ago to enlliterate my wish list, in response I heard sneering over my bad English - but none of the Captain SuperEnglish wanted to help me, perhaps he is not superhero but supervillain
-I asked for constructive criticism
in response i heard sneering and insults and destructive criticism
it seems like asking for help is pointless
If you make a wishlist the devs will patently ignore it and do what they've been doing the entire time. It takes a huge communal voice to affect anything, and as you can see a lot of people disagree with your views. But let's be constructive:
-"Make the tone darker and stuff."
Fair.
-"Add a schoolboy!"
Schoolboys aren't usually considered dark or mature in terms of setting. Adding one would definitely be counter to your intentions there. Granting one of these requests almost omits the other by default.
- "They should remove Yoshimitsu".
Your idea that Yoshi belongs in Tekken because he brings a unique element (weaponry) to that series is, firstly inaccurate, and secondly missing the point of Yoshimitsu. This is further suggested by your idea that we should have a non-weapon fighter instead as a substitute.
Yoshimitsu is supposed to be whimsical and interesting, he's refreshing vibrant in a game that's constantly at the point of drowning in it's own angst, but if you read into his lore he has some fairly serious lore.
You also argue that "people don't like him" but I'll talk about your focus group, such as it is, further down.
He's a well-received character and removing him would definitely be a negative.
-----
- "Make Raphael more like /this/ fictional vampire!
Fair.
- "STOP PLAGIARISING!"
Wait. What.
Both of these points are contradictory and basically read as "See this thing? More like this. But don't copy. Just, make it like that so it's obviously like it but not noticeably like it. Yeaaah!"
-----
I literally don't understand what your point about Zwei is, so I can't comment fairly.
-----
Your statistics are not only blatantly untrue and ridiculous (90% of the players only played V for Ezio), your only source to backup your claims are a bunch of people your friend sort of knows maybe.
Here you have the collection of the most dedicated Soulcalibur players telling you you're mistaken and your argument is "no because my friend from the internet asked a couple of people and they think you're wrong so you're wrong."
There's a line in your post I especially love: "The sad experience of online RPGs showed - games that do not have an influx of new players are gradually degrading."
That's because a majority rely on a paid-subscription service. Failure to produce quality content will lead to less subscribed players, thus less money, thus less content, thus the fun financial spiral.
Those that don't have a paid subscription model tend to push micro-transactions as a method of generating income.
Soulcalibur isn't an MMORPG. You buy the game once and they've made their money. Sure they'll have DLC and such in order to generate some extra cash, but it's not a requirement - A company wouldn't produce additional content for a game that didn't sell well. That's just bad business practice.
So I have to wonder in what way you meant to equate the two?
So as far as your wishlist goes, I respectfully disagree. A schoolboy character would be idiotic (Talim and Yun-Seong are the closest we have to that trope and both are exceedingly polarising), Yoshimitsu is a fun and interesting character with an original and unique fighting style and removing him would be a mistake, the game's mood is fine, I don't care about Raphael, not sure what your Zwei point is and 90% of the players did not buy the game just for Ezio.
