- Thread starter
- #25,021
SSfox
[14] Master
You're comparing the biggest fighting game franchise in the world to a game that almost never happened because it is a well known fact the head of the fighting game division at Namco has it out fo it.
You're comparing one of Capcom's key titles to one between many fighting games in Namco's belt.
You're comparing a sequel that lacked time not budget to a sequel that lacked both.
It is not a bad analogy, it is a terrible one.
PS: To everyone who is bitching about early DLC after flailing around asking to know what was in the season pass: Get better.
While you're making good points, but i'd like to remind that Street Fighter wasn't considered main title in the company for years... until SF4 happened.
Of course nowadays even with the fact that SFV didn't sell as well as Capcom wanted at launch they still consider SF as one of their main titles, you can clearly see it just by the amount of the support the game got that is just insane to say the least.